Author: Kaozai
As global stablecoins and crypto assets enter an "era of institutional competition," a country that previously received little attention from mainstream markets is quietly completing a crypto industry layout with a clear path, stable rhythm, and even strong national will — Uzbekistan. If you only look at scattered news, it's hard to understand the country's true intentions. On one hand, it blocks international exchanges; on the other, it issues local licenses. It tightly controls capital flows while promoting tokenization and stablecoin education. And now, it directly offers a "10-year tax exemption" mining special zone. This is not wavering, but an institutional design centered around "controllability." More directly put, Uzbekistan is trying to answer one question: Can a non-US dollar core country build its own financial infrastructure in the crypto era? Loosen—Tighten—Loosen Again Uzbekistan's crypto policy was never simply "support" or "ban" from the start, but a typical "exploratory regulatory path." In 2018, the country took the lead in legalizing cryptocurrency trading, but soon in 2019 imposed restrictions on local residents purchasing crypto assets, only allowing "selling." This stage was essentially aimed at preventing capital outflows and speculative risks. By 2021, a key turning point emerged in policy: regulators allowed residents to freely trade crypto assets on local licensed exchanges, while simultaneously refining token issuance and listing rules. This step signified an important change — Uzbekistan was no longer trying to "restrict crypto," but began to "define crypto." First "Close the Door," Then "Issue Licenses" The real institutional turning point came in 2022. That year, Uzbekistan did two seemingly contradictory but highly unified things: Blocked international trading platforms including Binance, Huobi, and Bybit, while simultaneously issuing crypto trading service licenses to local institutions. On the surface, it was "blockade," but in essence, it was "closing the net." Through this operation, regulators established a clear bottom line: crypto assets can circulate, but must do so within the domestic regulatory framework. That same year, the regulatory system was further refined: Introduced a monthly fee system for crypto service providers (directly into national finances), clarified regulatory classifications for different businesses like mining, custody, and exchanges, and mandated mining compliance and registration. The core logic of this system is very clear: not to let the market grow freely, but to incorporate the crypto industry into a "taxable, regulated, and measurable" national system. From Restriction to "National-Level Industrial Tool" If the trading side was "control-first," then in the mining sector, Uzbekistan's strategy was more industry-oriented. In 2022, the government explicitly stipulated that mining must use renewable energy like solar power, must obtain licenses and register, and anonymous mining is prohibited. At the time, many interpreted this as "restricting mining." But viewed over a longer cycle, this was actually doing something deeper — transforming mining from a "gray arbitrage industry" into a "controllable energy-consuming industrial activity." This logic was fully amplified in 2026. Uzbekistan announced the establishment of the "Besqala Mining Valley" special zone, covering the Karakalpakstan region: Mining income is tax-exempt until 2035, encourages the use of renewable energy, and allows free sale of crypto assets (but funds must flow back into the domestic banking system). This is not a simple "investment attraction policy," but a highly structured design: front-end loosening (mining income) + mid-end freedom (trading) + back-end locking (fund repatriation). In other words, computing power can be globalized, but funds must be localized. The State "Steps In" Directly If the previous stages were limited to "regulation and industry," then starting from 2023, Uzbekistan entered a more critical step — direct state participation in building the crypto financial system. The most typical example is the transformation of the national payment system HUMO. It launched blockchain tokens backed by government bonds, connected to a system with over 35 million cardholders, supported instant fiat conversion and on-chain transparent settlement, and interfaced with global networks like Visa, Mastercard, and UnionPay. This is no longer "crypto-friendly," but: directly mapping traditional financial infrastructure onto the chain. At the same time, the banking system was also brought into the experiment: Kapital Bank and Ravnaq Bank issued crypto entity cards, achieving interoperability between bank accounts and crypto accounts, and connecting to the payment network system. This means crypto assets are no longer just "investment products" but are starting to become "payment tools." Introducing External Forces to Fill the Knowledge Gap Amid the intensifying global stablecoin competition, Uzbekistan has chosen a relatively restrained but pragmatic path. In 2024, it signed a memorandum of cooperation with stablecoin issuer Tether: Promote the adoption of Bitcoin and stablecoins, establish an education system (for students and professionals), and promote P2P and blockchain infrastructure普及. The key here is not "introducing USDT," but rather: accelerating the construction of domestic knowledge and talent structure through mature external systems. This forms a closed loop with its mining, payment, and regulatory systems: Upstream: Energy + Mining, Midstream: Trading + Regulation, Downstream: Payment + Stablecoins, Support: Education + Talent. This combination of regulation, mining, payment, and stablecoins is not a fragmented push, but gradually points towards the same goal — completing the controllable integration of crypto assets within the system. Not Leading, but Controllable Markets tend to measure a country's crypto layout by "whether it becomes a global center," but Uzbekistan's path does not point towards this goal. From the licensing system and fund repatriation restrictions to the mining special zone and payment system on-chain, this series of actions is closer to an internal structural optimization — introducing crypto assets within a controllable range, improving capital efficiency, while avoiding systemic spillover risks. In other words, it is not competing for "global discourse power," but trying to answer a more practical question: To what extent can crypto assets be utilized without giving up financial sovereignty? For now, this answer is still taking shape. But what is certain is that the path Uzbekistan has chosen is not a radical one, but a "reversible and adjustable" middle path. And this path itself already speaks volumes.
*This content is for reference only and does not constitute investment advice. The market involves risks, and investment should be made cautiously.
Previous Recommendations
